Maintenance
A contractor sends a message:
“Done.”
The invoice arrives.
The landlord pays.
Case closed?
Not necessarily.
One of the most common weaknesses in maintenance administration is treating a contractor's attendance as proof that the underlying problem has been resolved.
Those are two different things.
A plumber may have attended a leaking toilet, but does the toilet still overfill?
A waterproofing contractor may have sealed an area, but has the repair been tested by subsequent rainfall?
An electrician may have reset a circuit, but has the original fault returned?
Good maintenance administration requires a final step: confirmation.
Depending on the repair, that could mean:
• completion photographs;
• a contractor's written description of the work;
• tenant confirmation;
• landlord confirmation;
• testing;
• a guarantee or warranty; or
• a follow-up inspection where appropriate.
This also helps when the same problem is reported again.
Instead of starting from zero, you have a record showing what was previously diagnosed, what work was completed, who completed it and when.
That record can be invaluable when determining whether you're dealing with a new defect, a failed repair or work that may still fall under a contractor's guarantee.
LeasePilot Thinking
“Contractor attended” is a status.
“Problem resolved” is an outcome.
Good property administration doesn't confuse the two.
If you're a hands-on landlord who wants to remain in control of your property without carrying all the administrative workload yourself, see whether LeasePilot is the right fit for you.